User talk:UA Victory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)


Your editing of Russo-Georgian war, especially the latest edits like this one [1] and the subsequent edit-warring [2][3][4] are indications of seriously disruptive tendentious editing. This is your only warning: if I see anything like this again, you will be topic-banned from the area. Fut.Perf. 10:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Standard notice[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Fut.Perf. 10:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


Well, I do not edit myself any really controversial subjects, because it is dangerous in many aspects. See my thoughts in this essay. For one thing, you just have received a black spot (above). That means you should not edit war anywhere and possibly switch to editing other pages. Speaking about content, you should not emphasize certain positions by simply adding words like "false", but instead add well sourced information that describes and explains actual events to a reader. In this case, it is important that the war was well preplanned by Russia in advance by moving certain detachments into certain positions and making other preparations (hence there is no question who was the actual aggressor). This seem to be missing in the introduction, and I can not help you with this or anything else. No time, sorry. My very best wishes (talk) 20:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC)