User talk:Ucycoin/sandbox
Appearance
Why was this sandbox "raked"?[edit]
What was wrong with this sandbox? Signed: Basemetal (write to me here) 17:03, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Regarding the sandbox, have you counted how many living persons were named in it? Were controversial statements made about any of them? Were those statements reliably sourced? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- for that matter; having now gone back & skimmed over the sandbox's previous contents, as suggested by demiurge1000, i find that i am NOT of the impression that the main focus of the article is on making potentially-libelous statements about living persons. it's long, ranty nonsense, certainly; but the point is it's in USERSPACE, not an article; we allow a certain leeway in what users choose to do with their "own" pages. we also appky a broader definition of wp:not censored.
- at the very least 3rd-party removal should have been done via proper process, not unilateral action. allowing that INVITES abuse.