User talk:Umeshghosh

Human Factors

Thanks for the detailed contribution to Human Factors. It is important that all articles be properly referenced. Therefore, would you kindly add references to your material? Also, if you need help in blending it with what was already on the page, please ask. Verne Equinox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Human_factors article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Ronz 20:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TIME 100: The People Who Shape Our World

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as TIME 100: The People Who Shape Our World, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.time.com/time/2006/time100/. As a copyright violation, TIME 100: The People Who Shape Our World appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. TIME 100: The People Who Shape Our World has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:TIME 100: The People Who Shape Our World. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at TIME 100: The People Who Shape Our World, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Erechtheus 16:35, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What can I say? I love the user boxes. As to the above, I'm not positive that this is a copyright issue, but it's important to identify potential issues. We'll see what an administrator thinks. Good luck with your contributions and be well. Erechtheus 16:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fyi, I speedy-tagged FHM-US's 100 Sexiest Women 2006 and reported Celebrity 100 for copyright determination (since it's older than 48 hours it is not speediable). Complete lists that were assembled by copyright-holding entitities (pretty much everybody but governments) are not acceptable as contributions. If you want to keep them you should excerpt the lists (probably the top 5) and add an encyclopedic context (selection process, history, reflection in media, controversies...). ~ trialsanderrors 20:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What substantiation is that based upon?

_________________________________________________________ Your Servant, Ume$h Ghosh Blog http://umesh4ever.blogspot.com Orkut http://www.orkut.com/Profile.aspx?uid=3632382679451682289 Yahoo Messenger fraternity_disposal@yahoo.co.in MySpace www.myspace.com/umesh1985 Esnips(Free ebooks and my songs) www.esnips.com/UserProfileAction.ns?id=c7449333-3ba6-40fc-8199-207120342dee _________________________________________________________

Both original sources come with copyright notices and terms of use. ~ trialsanderrors 02:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ergonomics

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Ergonomics article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Ronz 20:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Digestion & G protein sources?

What were the sources for your lengthy, detailed, one-time contributions to Digestion [1] and G protein [2]? --Ronz 02:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

online? if want to talk plz come to

yahoo messenger fraternity_disposal@yahoo.co.in

Please address the questions here. Where online did you find this information? --Ronz 19:51, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Physiology

The same applies to your former edit to physiology. You don't seem to have responded to these multiple warnings, and you still seem to be editing, so I hope you understand how inappropriate and damaging it is that you add material to Wikipedia from copyrighted sources. Hopefully you've realized your mistakes and have stopped doing this, though I would encourage you to go back through everything you have added and make sure no copyright violations remain. Richard001 05:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to my talk page

What do you mean 'is it possible to summarize all Wikipedia articles?'? Please don't add top level headers (like this: =Header=); use a second level header like this: ==Second level header==. These are the normal type, the other one throws the layout of the page off. Also, when you add a new section to the talk page add it at the bottom, not that top. You can use the + tab by 'edit this page'. And please sign your posts - users shouldn't have to check the history to figure out who you are. Thanks, Richard001 22:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, the lead section of an article will contain a concise summary of the article. See Wikipedia:Lead section for our guidelines on writing lead sections.-gadfium 02:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.marionegri.it/mn/en/index.html?l=en. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]