User talk:Uplkj

I have been blocked, The block will not be expired, please unblock me

August 2022

Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I noticed that you recently removed content from Japan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Liliana ^(UwU) 02:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. Your recent edit(s) to the page History of Bangladesh appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Your recent editing history at Narasingha Deva I shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Liliana ^{(UwU / nya)} 07:12, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Uplkj (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Uplkj reported by User:LilianaUwU (Result: ). Thank you. Liliana ^{(UwU / nya)} 07:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=I did not want to do disrupt edits, actually I am new user, I don't know how to do everything carefully ~~~~}}

. Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #62694

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]