User talk:User1937

Policies

Since you continue to edit without stating any intent to read policies, I no longer will assume good faith the next time you blunder into a policy violation. This could have been simple, but you have decided to make it difficult. Best of luck. Sundayclose (talk) 15:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But I read the policies?? User1937 (talk) 15:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read and understand "Any uninvolved editor may close most discussions" at WP:CLOSE? Did you read and understand "by submitting your ideas (for article organization, categorization, style, standards, etc.) to Wikipedia, you allow others to challenge and develop them." at WP:OWN? Do you understand the policies described at WP:CON, WP:DR, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:BLP? Sundayclose (talk) 16:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. User1937 (talk) 14:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, great to have your aboard. I hope you will not let the aggressive comments of Sundayclose deter you from editing, people are a little emotional in the wake of last week's election. Indeed, I hope you will stick around, we need more good editors on every topic. cheers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:44, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that is so so nice! I wish there were more people like you around here (and in the world lol). Thank a lot!!! :)

Hello, User1937, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:47, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jake chick.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jake chick.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of largest companies by revenue, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 18:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't you able to revert any edit made, and then discuss it in the Talk page? People were reverting my edits 24/7 on the Trump page, and I had to go to the Talk section to get anything approved. So what does the same not apply for me? Thank you. User1937 (talk) 18:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You were asked previously to stop removing entire columns. At that point the burden is on you to discuss and get consensus. I asked you earlier whether you read and understood a number of Wikipedia policies, and you replied "Absolutely". So which is it: you didn't read them or you didn't understand them? You have completely exhausted all assumption of good faith. You either are purposely violating policies, or you you don't have the competence to edit. It's one or the other; there is no other explanation at this point. Next policy violation, you're blocked. Sundayclose (talk) 18:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]