User talk:User38563

This is my Talk page.

December 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 15:31, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for 1 week for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Vic Darchinyan. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The material you were edit-warring to remove was clearly supported by the convention at List of boxing triple champions. If you wish to change it, you will need to discuss it on the Talk page and get a consensus to support you - your own personal assertion that something "doesn't count" is not enough. But generally, you need to change your aggressive and disruptive approach to editing, or you will soon end up with an indefinite block -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:44, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Extended block to two weeks due to continued disruption via IPs, mostlty as 178.99.224.114. Now stop that or the next block will be substantial. You seem to have some understanding of boxing but you also need to understand that this here isn't a combative but collaborative environment --Tikiwont (talk) 11:44, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, block evasion and a slate of personal attacks via multiple IP's. This is not about the content of the edits but the disruption you cause. .. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tikiwont (talk) 15:34, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

User38563 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The Admins are allowing constant vandalism to the boxing pages, and it needs to be stopped. Instead, they blocked me and not the vandals. One admin (MaterialScientist) even started vandalizing himselfUser38563 (talk) 10:24, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing attacks on other users will never result in anything but withdrawal of right to post further requests. Consider this a last warning. Max Semenik (talk) 10:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: You're not permitted to remove current block notices while the block is in place (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:00, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I'm not an admin, so I won't be making the unblock choice here. Attacking other users is a very bad thing. I should warn you in the future about these attacks. All the best, ~~Fanatical Submarine~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fanatical Submarine (talk • contribs) 12:30, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]