Jump to content

User talk:Usercreate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jennifer Hudson's debut album

[edit]

If I may ask, why has the cover been deleted? CaravaggioFan (talk) 08:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Destiny Fulfilled Limited Edition.JPG)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Destiny Fulfilled Limited Edition.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suki

[edit]

Please don't destroy a page to "create" a new one. For that go to Suki (Avatar: The Last Airbender). Rau's Speak Page 17:56, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Umm look again. There are plenty of links on that page. And even if it did, you still don't rewrite an article to a completely different topic. Rau's Speak Page 18:02, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You look. I removed a link to a disambig page. Nothing more. You, however, removed links to two characters. Rau's Speak Page 18:07, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What does that even matter? Rau's Speak Page 18:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter. Just because they don't appear doesn't mean they aren't notable. Wikipedia doesn't add articles on whether or not they are main characters, but whether or not they are notable. And notability doesn't go away if the character stops appearing. Rau's Speak Page 18:21, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I may jump in here, but notability does sometimes leave when the character stops appearing. That fate happened to Admiral Zhao when he was demoted from Main Characters list to Secondary Characters list. --haha169 (talk) 05:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

[edit]

I'm not reverting, I'm replying. It just never seems to stay... Rau's Speak Page 20:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE

[edit]

That particular sentence wasn't - that was a violation of WP:N. --haha169 (talk) 23:05, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, it is, since there are no cites for that fact. But the main point is WP:N here, because Suki doesn't need a Ty Lee biography on her article. --haha169 (talk) 23:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't delete them. I archived them to this location, hence my edit summary, "archive". And fine, you do what you want, I'm giving up on all the character bios except for Aang. --haha169 (talk) 04:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Won't Hold Back (album)

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Won't Hold Back (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Won't Hold Back (album)

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Won't Hold Back (album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Won't Hold Back (album). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Usercreate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Somebody unblock me. I thought we settle this a while back. In case User:Kevin didn't know for being stupid. He didn't even let me know that I was block. He never talked it over to anyone, he just took imediate action and assumed that I was a sockpuppet just because I was telling User:Kww about the other singles Nicole had. Usercreate (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The listed checkuser result seems pretty clear to me. A lack of block template from the blocking admin, while slightly inconvenient, is not grounds for an unblock, and I stress that accusing other editors of being "backstabber(s)" and "stupid" are not real great ways to convince an uninvolved admin to unblock. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 17:14, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comments to reviewing admins:
Your checkuser is wrong. The instructions came when your blocked, the page tells you how get unblocked. And for insisting that Soccermeko's edit was right, you told me to prove it and I did. You block people when they get to closed to the true because I proved by proving sources. Usercreate (talk) 17:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment First of all, User:Kww you are nothing but a big backstabber. I trying to help you with page. If I was soccermeko, I would have just made the edits of discography page without talking it over. My discussion on the talk page proved that I was right. And it was true that whoever edit the any of the page, you automatically thinks it a sockpuppet of Soccermeko. User:Kevin nothing is confirmed if your so stupid that you are unable to tell two different people apart. User:Kww your language most be distinctive if you think how I editted the page Won't Hold Back (album) is bad. And your comment came from the same people. Usercreate (talk) 17:01, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Comment' Well, then you blocked another user who innocent. Because like i said, User:Kww is nothing but a gay backstabber, User:Kevin is dumb person, and UltraExactZZ is the dumbest for believing them. Usercreate (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked users who use their talk page for personal attacks find their user talk pages protected for the duration of the block. This'll be your only warning on the matter. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 17:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't give a fuck what you say because you are gay to. Usercreate (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Usercreate&oldid=443275082"