User talk:V952010

Welcome!

A cartoon centipede reads books and types on a laptop. — The Wikipede and the Picture Tutorial. *(image credit)*

Welcome!

Hello, V952010, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Talk:Economy of India, show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process – at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FY 2023 is emding and these are IMF estimates for FY 23.

FY 2023 is emding and these are IMF estimates for FY 23.why remove them? 2405:204:3480:2738:4956:3839:5DE1:B46D (talk) 08:09, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

india follows a fiscal year of 2023-2024 not fy 2022 or fy 2023 so the correct number will be the new numbers of fy 2023 onwards

https://www.newindianexpress.com/business/2023/jan/20/india-to-be-usd-37-trillion-economy-in-2023-rbi-2539612.html#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAt%20current%20prices%20and%20exchange,recent%20bulletin%20released%20on%20Thursday. V952010 (talk) 03:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring at Mumbai

@V952010Plaese don't edit war with me at Mumbai the image I have uploaded in the infobox is much better because of the image dimensions which are much larger, the quality and clarity are also much better, also the skyline looks much taller in that image. Plus the image is the latest, it was uploaded in March 2023 and all the skyscrapers in lower parel are visible be it world one, world view, trump tower, lodha allura please don't change it. Thanks. Joy goel (talk) 14:14, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

im srry the image is very horrible its bad beacause the grey building in that image is stuck for lik e 10 years the image will not be the cover image of mumbai V952010 (talk) 14:15, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@V952010 Thats not a valid reason its much more impressive looking i'm sorry i will have to revert. and as i said before its a March 2023 image all lower parel skyscraper are covered in that image. Joy goel (talk) 14:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

bro that is a bad image lower parel is not mumbai , u can have it in cityscape but not as the cover image , i dont want edit war either but that image will not be the cover image for mumbai , if u have one that shows all the skyline then cool otherwise nope V952010 (talk) 14:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@V952010Okay fine i'm adding that image to the Architecture section but im removing your goregaon image because it not a good representation of the skyline, let me know it you have any objections also 2 images in the cityscape section are enough please dont add more images and also dont change images in the cityscape section. Joy goel (talk) 14:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no problem , i changed my image to another one of better quailty u can have a look V952010 (talk) 14:35, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@V952010PLease Dont remove that image from the pages like you did at List of tallest buildings in India i'm reverting your changes sorry, Joy goel (talk) 14:38, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i only removed it from list of tallest building cus it should not represent mumbai , it remains everywhere else V952010 (talk) 14:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i didnt remove it from anywhere else V952010 (talk) 14:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@V952010im adding it back im sorry if your revert or remove it i will report you. Joy goel (talk) 14:42, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

np V952010 (talk) 14:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i saw your profile and you have made a ton of contributions to india's wiki, looks like your a proud indian like me i respect that ,if this means that much to you go ahead do as u please i wont stop you now . i was just angry at that grey building ,as u know mumbai has tons of them and people always show the dirty side of my great city so i wanted to have great images thats why i have uploaded so many new ones , but cus u have been at this longer than i have u can change it as u want thank you for your work V952010 (talk) 14:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@V952010Thanks for your words, so you mean i can add that lower parel skyline image to the Mumbai infobox and you won't revert? Joy goel (talk) 15:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes i wont goahead V952010 (talk) 15:41, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

but if i find a better one then i will remove it :) just place mine in the cityscape ty by removing one of the 3 or 2 V952010 (talk) 15:42, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@V952010 Okay then, I'm adding the lower parel skyline image to the infobox and the versova skyline image to the cityscape section, if you have any objections please let me know on my talk page. TPhanks. Joy goel (talk) 15:51, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no opjections V952010 (talk) 15:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

objecitons* V952010 (talk) 15:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the image u posted shows only lower parel , mumbai skyline is bigger than that if u want to put it the cityscape section go ahead but not as the cover page if u want a higher quality then i have a higher one but that Grey building stuck for 10 years cannot be the cover image srry V952010 (talk) 14:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello @V952010 I noticed your recent edit at Mumbai, this is in regards to the main image in the infobox, if possible could you upload an image which is larger horizontally rather than vertically in dimensions. The current image you have added is too large vertically and i'm not quite happy with it, for instance the Worli skyline image you had uploaded earlier which got deleted was a much better in regards to image dimensions. So just for the time being i'm adding the Lower parel image to the infobox and your Worli image to the cityscape section. If and when you upload a better image you can add it to the infobox, Thanks. Joy goel (talk) 15:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok V952010 (talk) 21:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:GettyImages-1241135178 (1).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:GettyImages-1241135178 (1).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warning

I added comment DO NOT CHANGE; FINANCIAL YEAR - 1 APRIL TO 31 MARCH! but you keep updating GDP. Also, at Talk: Economy of India you can see discussion. If you noticed, I reverted edits many times. DO NOT UPDATE AGAIN AND AGAIN. Dinesh | Talk 05:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at 2020–2021 China–India skirmishes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 02:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi V952010! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 02:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]