User talk:Verarsch

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.

-- Diannaa (talk) 20:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Verarsch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The name chosen does not translate into a vulgar phrase, which showcases the lack of knowledge, bias and privilege of the Administrator, and is not profane, threatening, or does not directly intend to harm the Wikipedia community. The Administrator who blocked the User shows an unusual interest for articles relating to the Second World War and the Holocaust, which indicates that the Administrator may have blocked the user out of purely political or even racially motivated reasons, if not at least because the Administrator disagreed with the User on an edit. The Administrator is requested to demonstrate proof that the User either provided a vulgar or damaging username or made erroneous or vandalizing edits that seriously harmed the community.Verarsch (talk) 08:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not willing to entertain a request that includes a personal attack against the blocking admin. PhilKnight (talk) 10:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.