User talk:Via 78 70 161 206

July 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Oakhill, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 09:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There can logicall be no citation for a non-event. Can you disprove it. I have replaced it do not relmove it. Via 78 70 161 206 (talk) 09:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Oakhill. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. How do you know that homeless were not offered sponsorship? Did you do a survey? Did you read about such a survey? Adakiko (talk) 10:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Oakhill, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 10:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you are voilating the policy. There were no British people offered sponsorship. Your own reference demonstrates that. Kindly stop being so woke and repulsive. Deal with the facts. Via 78 70 161 206 (talk) 10:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Oakhill. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:08, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 10:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]