User talk:Vincet1980

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, MOadmin, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

NawlinWiki (talk) 21:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Allowing username change to vincet1980 (talk · contribs). Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking.

Request handled by: Hersfold ^(t/a/c)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Property auction

It seemed like this article - which didn't really say much that isn't in the main Auction article - was basically an excuse to put in the website addresses of the various auctioneers. See WP:COATRACK and WP:SPAM. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:25, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I concur wholeheartedly. --Orange Mike | Talk 09:01, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is very sad. I came to Wikipedia believing the pillars upon which it is founded, one of which is freedom of speech. The fact is this piece is adding new information and I now see that all information is OK provided a select group of mods agrees with it. Perhaps you can point out to me where on the general "Auctions" page it describes the process of a property auction, which is quite distinct?