User talk:Vision n sound
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Simon Bonwick, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 08:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Simon Bonwick, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 08:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Simon Bonwick. Melcous (talk) 09:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
"Minor" edits[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Burchetts Green, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Melcous (talk) 09:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Again, please don't mark all of your edits as minor. If you aren't sure whether an edit counts as minor, leave the box unticked. --McGeddon (talk) 14:15, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
April 2017[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Simon Bonwick, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Per WP:DAILYMAIL, the Daily Mail is no longer considered a reliable source by Wikipedia, and should not be added to articles. McGeddon (talk) 14:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Possible conflict of interest[edit]
Hello, Vision n sound. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Simon Bonwick, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 15:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
April 2017[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones (Talk) 17:44, 18 April 2017 (UTC)