User talk:Vladimir serg

Welcome!

Hello, Vladimir serg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:45, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your unexplained reverts[edit]

Please stop your unmotivated and unexplained reverts to the outdated, poorly sourced and written (obviously machine-translated), and unbalanced version. Discuss first on Talk page.Axxxion (talk) 10:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue this destructive activity, it will be reported to ANI and your account may be blocked.Axxxion (talk) 13:14, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported your activity: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Some admin action required for Zapad 2017 exercise.Axxxion (talk) 13:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And again at: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#The problem with Zapad 2017 exercise persists.Axxxion (talk) 15:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Zapad 2017 exercise. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. — fortunavelut luna 14:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zapad 2017 exercise. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Malinaccier (talk) 00:09, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]