User talk:Volksgeist

Welcome!

Hello, Volksgeist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Rockero 17:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Illegal"

Before you go any further, please review the terminological discussions at Talk:Illegal immigration and Talk:Great American Boycott (and I'm sure there are more elsewhere). Basically, the consensus was to use the term "illegal immigrant" for people residing in the United States who either made unauthorized border-crossings or overstayed their visas.--Rockero 17:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

South Africa

Hi Volksgeist, Which school i will be attending has yet to be finalised but i do know that it will be located somewhere in suburban Cape Town. I guess that from what people here on Wikipedia say South Africa sounds alot like New Zealand with the exception been NZ is rather more developed (econmy etc...) and has a majority white population of around 75% so it's not as multicultral. Similarities been the stunning landscapes, English South Africans and to a certain degree Afrikaners are similar in culture to NZders and Australians and (i know this will sound racist) Maori are similar to the natives of SA e.g high crime rates, somewhat oppressed (by Europeans) and violent.

Could you please give me a further insight?

Cheers, Arguss 01:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I Complaint

I have witnessed the personal abuse you have taken in the Israel discussion page. It is a violation of the Wikipedia rules, and I have added a complaint to the Administrator's Noticeboard [[1]]. I would be careful in giving people fodder for what they can use to try to document you as a "jew hater." Understandably they have attacked you, but responding in certain ways gives other unbiased Admins an excuse to ignore/justify their inexcusable behavior. Sarastro777 19:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I guess it is nevermind on that. An Administrator has closed the matter for discussion because he perceives the namecalling as "calling a spade a spade." The hypocrisy would appear to be that at no time will it ever be sanctioned on the Administrator's board to call someone a "jew lover." Sarastro777 19:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you 100%, there are a lot of double standards, hypocrisy, and censorship. I recently had my entire userpage blanked and protected so I could not add anything to it. The offense was "personal attack" and "conspiracy theory", which in reality was documenting Megaphone_desktop_tool which alerts hundreds of thousands of Jewish activists worldwide to Internet sites so they can be slanted with a Pro-Israel bias. Checkout the userpage of the censoring admin: User:El_C. I think that pretty much explains it. Most of these people actually think they are doing the right thing for the "people's encyclopedia" by running around namecalling and censoring. It's dramatic irony with no parallel. Sarastro777 20:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder of 3 revert rule

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:05, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your presence is requested

As you have been actively involved in editing Israel please check out [Request for arbitration]

Iman al-Hams

Please go here right away. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iman Darweesh Al Hams --Daniel575 | (talk) 14:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Race and Mathematics

Ive seen your racist and ignorant and offensive comments:

[2]

Do not do this again.

You insult 2 ethnic groups and for your information some of the worlds top physicists are black and there are black and Hispanic mathematicians. Also consider that Blacks and Hispanics are the poorest ethnic groups in the US and consider that wealthy whites outperform poor whites at mathematics.

Doesn't take much of a mathematician or much of a plain idiot to put 2 and 2 together does it now?

--Globe01 19:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it inconceivable that whites as a group in the US are wealthier than blacks and hispanics because they outperform them, rather than they the outperform them because they are wealthier? Booshank (talk) 00:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About your comments

I have noticed you have left some comments that are uncivil and inflammotary. Please be more civil Volkgeist. You very nice place 22:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Volksgeist"

What could be expected from a user with a name like "Volksgeist" other than anti-Semitism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.121.50 (talk) 19:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]