Jump to content

User talk:Volley36

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm more than a bit disappointed my edits regarding PRESENTMENT of Postal Orders were redacted. While there may well be extensive additional information under OTHER titles, this title is the one people reach first when they want to know what a money order is. As a civil-law notary I see NO reason not to tell them up front about the issues of presentment in money order negotiation. Otherwise this article acquiesces to a view that money orders are safe and reliable - and under average conditions that MAY be true, but under certain conditions purchasers should consider their purchase of a money order (in the US or Canada) as a contribution to that government. Presentment is critical, it requires the issuer to know how it will manifest at the time of purchase, and to allow this to be ignored is an academic fraud supporting a financial one. Volley36 (talk) 01:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

[edit]
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "money orders". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 14 April 2012.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 20:39, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

[edit]
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Money order". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 24 April 2012.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:05, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

[edit]
The request for formal mediation concerning Money order, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, Lord Roem (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)