User talk:Volunteer Marek/Arch2

EEML

The information you added in this edit appears more suitable for the evidence page. Please move it there. Thanks. KnightLago (talk) 03:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

See here. KnightLago (talk) 16:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Refactor

Please refactor this. Criticism of the Arbitration Committee is great, and healthy. But I think you have gone over the top here. Particularly the "bwahahahahahahahahahaha. Haha. Ha. Hhh. Chrhhh. Arghghggh. Chrumpf Chrump. Choke choke. Oh I'you'me choking me - help me ... ok ,I got my breath ,bwah .., ha ha. ha .ok ... mmmmhhhh" part. Also, please sign your posts. Thanks. KnightLago (talk) 15:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

I was thinking the entire quoted portion above. Maybe sum it up in a normal sentence? Or a few words that describe your feelings? KnightLago (talk) 18:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

I removed it. Is it ok now?radek (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Yup. Thanks for the cooperation. KnightLago (talk) 19:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Schieder commission

On the subject of refactoring, please also refactor your comment at Talk:Schieder_commission#Again. If you feel baited, please don't give in. It's important to maintain civil editing atmosphere. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:34, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

PS. You may want to take a breather from that article; the atmosphere is not very relaxing there, to say the least. Hopefully, Hans can take it over. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Re : Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern European mailing list

This arbitration case has been closed, and the final decision may be viewed at the link above.

• User:Piotrus resigned the administrator tools during the case proceedings and may only seek to regain adminship by a new request for adminship or by request to the Arbitration Committee.
• User:Piotrus is banned for three months. At the conclusion of his ban, a one year topic ban on articles about Eastern Europe, their talk pages, and any related process discussion, widely construed, shall take effect.
• User:Digwuren is banned for one year. He is directed to edit Wikipedia from only a single user account, and advise the Arbitration Committee of the name of the account that he will use. Should he not advise the committee by the end of the one year ban, he will remain indefinitely banned until a single account is chosen.
• User:Digwuren is placed on a one year topic ban on articles about Eastern Europe, their talk pages, and any related process discussion, widely construed. This shall take effect following the expiration of both above mentioned bans.
• The following users are topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe, their associated talk pages, and any process discussion about same, widely construed, for one year:

• User:Biruitorul, User:Dc76, User:Martintg, User:Miacek, User:Radeksz, User:Vecrumba, User:Tymek

• User:Jacurek is topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe, their associated talk pages, and any process discussion about same, widely construed, for six months.
• User:Tymek is strongly admonished for having shared his account password. He is directed to keep his account for his own exclusive use, and not to allow any other person to use it under any circumstance.
• The editors sanctioned above (Piotrus, Digwuren, Martintg, Tymek, Jacurek, Radeksz, Dc76, Vecrumba, Biruitorul, Miacek) are prohibited from commenting on or unnecessarily interacting with Russavia on any page of Wikipedia, except for purposes of legitimate and necessary dispute resolution.
• All the participants to the mailing list are strongly admonished against coordinating on-wiki behavior off-wiki and directed to keep discussion of editing and dispute resolution strictly on wiki and in public. All editors are reminded that the editorial process and dispute resolution must take place on Wikipedia itself, using the article talk pages and project space for this purpose. No discussion held off-wiki can lead to a valid consensus, the basis of our editorial process. Off-wiki coordination is likely to lead to echo chambers where there is a false appearance of neutrality and consensus.

For the Arbitration Committee, Mailer Diablo 17:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC) - Discuss this