User talk:Wackopedia is not about truth

The account you created has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wackopedia is not about truth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What is the blatant violation? Can you cite your sources please? Please explain your "truth". Further, if I've contributed, how can you claim I haven't? Make sense please. If I was referring to Wikipedia than all you did was confirm my user name. Further, Wikipedia isn't about truth, as you and other administrators repeatedly claim, so how is my user name a blatant violation? Make sense. Get a dictionary or use an online one, and look up the meaning of the word truth. If you keep denying what it means and keep opposing it, how can you claim to know what it means when you use the word (truth)?.

Decline reason:

"Wackopedia" could easily be mistaken for an insult, which is why this name is not appropriate. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:14, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wackopedia is not about truth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

FisherQueen said, 'Wackopedia' could easily be mistaken for an insult, which is why this name is not appropriate." Again, where is your source/s for this claim? What is your reference? You are breaking the NPOV rules. You are not to inject original research into Wikipedia. Please show me your evidence that Wackpoedia can be mistaken as an insult. Further, you have not answered the rest of my points which refute this blocking: What is the blatant violation? Can you cite your sources please? Please explain your "truth". Further, if I've contributed, how can you claim I haven't? Make sense please. If I was referring to Wikipedia than all you did was confirm my user name. Further, Wikipedia isn't about truth, as you and other administrators repeatedly claim, so how is my user name a blatant violation? Make sense. Get a dictionary or use an online one, and look up the meaning of the word truth. If you keep denying what it means and keep opposing it, how can you claim to know what it means when you use the word. Further FisherQueen and rest of the admins, Wikipedia_is_not_about_truth was forbidden as a user name, why? If Wikipedia isn't about truth why is the name claimed to be inappropriate? Please free the name for use then.By having blocked my and this name and the Wikipedia name you are only showing that Wikipedia is WACKO. Stop being impulsive when you judge. "Be slow to judge and quick to listen." You rush headlong into judgment and show carelessness by doing so.

Decline reason:

What PMDrive said, below. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Completely blocked

Access to your talk page is now denied. Kindly find another site to troll. Thank you. PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Completely blocked

Access to your talk page is now denied. Kindly find another site to troll. Thank you. PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]