User talk:WakiMiko
|
You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Evol to a different title - however your request has been contested for being controversial, and has been moved to the contested proposals section. Requests that remain there will be removed after seven days.
Please make sure you have completed the following:
- Added a place for discussion at the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved. This can easily be accomplished by adding {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the page, which will automatically create a discussion section there. Note: See instructions at WP:RM.
If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. EVOL is an acronym for? 199.125.109.102 (talk) 02:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
The article Ten (manga) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not assert notability or demonstrate coverage by reliable third party sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Farix (t | c) 00:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Ten (manga)
[edit]
I have nominated Ten (manga), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten (manga). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Farix (t | c) 20:28, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Per your request you are now a Reviewer
[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. 7 23:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Plain Text
[edit]I find the edit by 77.248.214.104.109 very useful.
Are you sure this should have been reverted?
03:37, 27 February 2012 WakiMiko (talk | contribs) m (9,000 bytes) (Reverted edits by 77.248.214.109 (talk) to last version by Adamtester)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plain_text&action=history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.61.152.124 (talk) 09:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- There is no point in linking to a specific text editor, might as well link to all of them. The article itself already contains a link to text editor. And the Commons have absolutely no media for "plain text", so why link to them? --WakiMiko (talk) 13:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, WakiMiko. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)