User talk:WangViolin

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

WangViolin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "IExistToHelp". The reason given for IExistToHelp's block is: "lying about making mistakes, pretending someone else was using your computer, wasting peo

Blocking administrator: Floquenbeam (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: This is painfully obviously the same user. Also, I just noticed, you admit that it seemed like a good idea to get someone blocked; if that was true, why in the world do you think we would value you here? Go away. Declined. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not him, I just came over to finish homework today with him. Today will be the only day I edit. I promise.WangViolin (talk) 22:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So he created this account "for you" on the 14th, got blocked on the 18th, and now you just happened to try to log on for the very first time at his house. And you only want to edit today?! What is that about? I'll let someone independent of me accept/decline this, but I'm not buying it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing admin: FYI, other accounts IExistToHelp created for "friends" and "family". [1]. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I am part of his orchestra and his classmate ok? Me and some other guy went on his computer ok. Let's just say he isn't bright sometimes and didn't close his laptop. It was break time and I was like dude we should get him blocked. The other guy was User: Random Account and is blocked. So anyways a month or so before, he made an tutorial video on how to create an Wikipedia account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfAPr_VKe0Q. Then, apparently someone thought he was User:GAMTWMV who was his neighbor, so she/he said he's a sockpuppet, let's block him. Back on track, IExistToHelp was scared, so he went around sounding dumb apologizing. He isn't bright sometimes. We go to each other's houses to do homework on Tuesday, cuz we have history together. When he realized that he sounded dumb when he said that I did the vandalism, he decided to take the blame for the hoax tagging which I did(he really needs to turn off his devices). He has promised not to do NPP for three months and kept cursing at my friend. Yeah, only want to edit for a day. After a day, you won't see me in the recent edits anymore. WangViolin (talk) 22:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geez the way I tell the story, I sound like I'm requesting User:IExistToHelp and User:Random Account to be unblocked too. Only unblock me pls, the other two aren't worthy of unblocking, cuz one is deemed a liar and the other is apparently a puppet. Shame!!!!! Thank God, they're blocked indefinitely so they can't do anything about me. IExistToHelp's name is Jason, Random Account's name is Coopar. He did create an account for his brother, Daniel who is two years younger, hence User: DGames. I ain't lying.WangViolin (talk) 22:51, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The very, very first step is going to have to be stop lying. You are not nearly as good at it as you think. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fine then. One day and block me, I don't care. You don't believe me. Be stubborn all you want, I'm patient. Since when do I want to be that junk? WangViolin (talk) 23:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want to do it. Random Account did it, not me. The only reason I joined, was to get revenge for dropping my phone on the ground. I'll upload a picture to prove it on Commons. WangViolin (talk) 23:03, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]