User talk:Wassup2190

October 2012

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Grande Roue de Paris, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 07:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Grande Roue de Paris, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 94.197.160.145 (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Grande Roue de Paris. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 188.28.164.15 (talk) 02:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC) previously 94.197.160.145[reply]

Hello, Wassup2190. You have new messages at Jim1138's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Grande Roue de Paris. Jim1138 (talk) 05:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grande Roue de Paris

Do not remove sourced content with unsourced content. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 05:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Grande Roue de Paris shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Please also read WP:SOURCES. Thank you. 188.29.148.14 (talk) 09:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Luna Park, Paris, Grande Roue de Paris, Exposition Universelle (1889), and Low Orbit Ion Cannon. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. 183.89.0.89 (talk) 07:17, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]