User talk:Webmasterfrancinedeecom

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Francine Dee. Thank you. Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Francine Dee. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:17, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks!

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Francine Dee page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Francine_Dee, you will be blocked from editing. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

Why does information you have provided conflict with her MySpace page? How does her birth name put her at risk? If you are saying WP:BLP applies, what aspect? Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aquainted with User:Francinedeenaked? - Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]