User talk:Westbeverly1993

BLP issues

I have reverted your edits on Paul Bracken as they are a WP:BLP violation. All statements about living persons must be properly cited and uncited statements must be removed.

The article was discussed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard/Archive_93#Proud_Prophet_and_Paul_Bracken Kylesenior (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Question: Do you have a WP:Conflict of interest (please read that guideline) regarding the Paul Bracken WP article? If so, please follow the guidance there. And don't WP:COPYPASTE. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:15, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Your edit to Paul Bracken has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — LauritzT (talk) 16:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Westbeverly1993! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Paul Bracken several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Paul Bracken, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. — LauritzT (talk) 16:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]