User talk:Wiikwajio

Edit-warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Independent American Party of Nevada. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Orange Mike | Talk 05:50, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to editing. I am sorry if I violated the rules in any way. I was simply trying to add what should be a non-controvercial FACT to the page. I have attempted to place a this simple fact about the Independent American Party of Nevada on the site and it is continually removed. The addition was: Christopher Hansen, the former State Chairman, started Independent American News http://independentamerican.org in 2008 to cover current Independent American Party issues and candidates. Every word of this statement is true. If Wikipedia is not allowing the truth concerning the Independent American Party history to be placed on the site then what good is Wikipedia and how can it be trusted at all? I would like to know what is my next step to getting this simple fact out about what the former Chairman has done to keep people inform about what is currently happening with the Independent American Party since the Independent American Party web site seldom has updates.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiikwajio (talk • contribs) — Wiikwajio (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

That website is really basically a personal blog of Hansen's. It is not an IAPN official website; a lot of the content is not about the AIPN; thus it has no place in this article. All you're really doing (repeatedly, without explanation) is adding a spamlink to the article. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:10, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Reno Gazette Journal, the Las Vegas Sun and the Las Vegas Review Journal all ran the article called "Hansens are the heart of the IAP" http://www.iapn.org/Sep2702.htm So frankly to call the Independent American News web site a Hansen blog is to show to what total lack of understanding you have about the Independent American Party.The Independent American Party was started by the Hansens. Christopher Hansen was 10 years old and was getting signatures to get the IAP on the ballot in 1967 and 68, Dan Hansen was the founder. While Christopher Hansen was State Chairman the party grew by 200%. Joshua Hansen, Nicholas Hansen, Whitney Hansen, Jonathan Hansen, Joel Hansen, Danny Hansen, Ruth Hansen, Gregory Hansen, Dawn Hansen all have run for office as IAPs. Christopher Hansen ran 6 times as an IAP. Hansens are running for office THIS YEAR include Jonathan Hansen, Congress District One; Janine Hansen, Assembly; and Joel Hansen for Attorney General. Christopher Hansen, who runs Independent American News, posts articles of interest to Independent Americans because he knows the Independent American Party better then almost anyone in this nation. The Tampa controversy was caused 100% by Christopher Hansen's position on abortion. Independent American News does pages for the IAP candidates and will be posting a page for almost EVERY candidate. IAPN.org will not be doing so. We cover the day to day of the IAP. IAPN.org does not cover the day to day of the party news. To leave all references of Independent American News off the Wikipedia site is to lie about the party.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiikwajio (talk • contribs) — Wiikwajio (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

"We"? Oh? Who is this "we" of which you write?--Orange Mike | Talk 04:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I've read that blog. Articles like "Cops viciously assault, kicked detained man" about an incident in Virginia, have nothing to do with a political party in Nevada. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spamlinks

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Independent American Party of Nevada. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Orange Mike | Talk 05:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Independent American Party of Nevada, you may be blocked from editing. Claritas § 17:08, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Independent American Party of Nevada, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Claritas § 17:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 17:49, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Independent American Party of Nevada, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Signing your posts

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]