User talk:WilliamJustinM

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, WilliamJustinM! I am User:WilliamJustinM

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

Thanks to Peter.C for welcoming me into the Wikipedia community! I just made an edit on this page 'owning it'. Is that proper Wiki protocol? Is this page for me or for the other editors wondering what the heck I'm doing? ...

my first edit

I just made my first edit. It all seems confusing. I changed an odd image credit in the article about the artist James Tissot. The Museum owns the whole set of watercolors done by Tissot about the "Life of Christ". Who are the people writing and editing? What do they get out of this? Where is the order?

I've now made another edit of the Underground Railway article and the Runaway Slaves article

using an image of the Brooklyn Museum Eastman Johnson's A Ride for Liberty -- The Fugitive Slaves. I'm not sure still of proper etiquette. How much ownership do editors feel over articles?

Then the third edit I've made is to this page. Is it ok to rewrite your own page?

WilliamJustinM (talk) 15:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Today the site wasn't working again(something about servers?). It's easier now to know what to do. The big problem is the understanding of what is appropriate do, how much to change and how much to include. We are trying to be respectful and consistent. The hardest part is to keep track of the edits we're doing on a spreadsheet so a record is kept.

Tissot

Hi, The Brooklyn has a pretty nice collection, and I was impressed by Crucifixion, seen from the Cross (James Tissot). Do you know, or anyone there knows, if there are any other views from above paintings like this? By the way, I think by now you know the image formats, so that should be settled. You can just copy from other pages and that may be the easiest way. Cheers. History2007 (talk)

Jesus : Harold Copping

I found an image misattributed to James Tissot on the page about 'Jesus'. I could see it wasn't by Tissot and could read the signature, "Harold Copping". I'd never heard of him and looked him up and found out that he had been a prolific artist of the Victorian Era. In trying to correct the mistake, I needed to create a page about him. So then:

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Harold Copping, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/ARTcopping.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 16:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Jesus

There is a lock icon at the top of the 'Jesus' page. This is, unsurprisingly, one of the most visited pages on WikiPedia, so I can completely understand the necessity for keeping it free of vandalism and crazy additions. An editor, 'Grafen', has some sort of stewardship over the page and the editBot in place twice reverted my addition of a small portrait of Jesus by Tissot. In exploration of this I looked at the history of the page which is sort of hysterical. It's a long listing of various editors making changes and then the editBots reverting them. The wiki phrase is 'protecting Jesus' alternating with 'unprotecting Jesus'... protecting Jesus/unprotecting Jesus. It is a headscratcher figuring out how to best place the images done by James Tissot of the Life of Christ into the many pages within WikiPedia. So many different articles and so many different formats looking at the atomized parts of the bible and the life of Jesus. So what is the 'take-a-way'? 1.) Jesus is still creating a tremendous amount of debate. 2.) That most folks are ok, but that the very few that aren't, screw up everything way out of proportion. 3.) A good way to deal with the world is to see the humor everpresent in anything having to do with human beings.

Hi, the correct place to discuss edits to the "Jesus" article is its talk page at Talk:Jesus. Graham87 00:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[feedback]

While I was checking on some edits I noticed that one of the images had been taken off. Fellow User(Volunteer) History2007 noted that it's getting to be too tissot-pedia. Yes, I agreed that there are a lot of images that Tissot created that are relevant to the Life of Christ. I've place some 30 of the 350 images. So how to best make use of this strange asset that the Museum owns and keep in line with the wiki-protocols. Well, the Museum also has a set of Hiroshige.

Here is the note from one other user ... Me: I am the tissot-er. I am focusing on some image assets. We have the whole set of Tissot's and they continue to be a popular request. I don't actually know much about the Life of Jesus but have been learning. I've tried to respect the general approach of wiki and don't want to offend. Which scenes of the Life of Christ might best be illustrated by Tissot? It is such a huge area but it's sort of atomized in it's structure. Advice? Suggestions? Thanks WilliamJustinM WilliamJustinM (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

   Well I would generally avoid the traditional scenes listed at Life of Christ, but individual miracles are often little illustrated. It would be helpful if you or someone could label the image files with the gospel references for at least the less-familiar scenes. Disciple (Christianity) could use maybe this, Joseph of Arimathaea this, Ordination this, and so on. Of course in an article on the cycle, for which you must have access to excellent materials, you could use a whole lot. Johnbod (talk) 19:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

batch uploading of images

I need to upload a lot of images to Wikimedia Commons. There is a FAQ with links to the site for "Commonist"(odd to see a hammer and sickle again!). How open is the systems with connections to Wiki? What firewalls or safety precautions are there? Privacy is gone right? what about security? How ok is enough?

All over

Hi, FYI: as in here it is going all over the world now - nice image too. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 21:27, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

moving ahead with placements.

Now, I am (we are) placing images from a collection of images from India of Vishnu. He's all blue, powerful and everpresent. And he has ten 'avatars' that are his incarnations into the realm of our being. So many stories and so many characters. At least with Tissot and Jesus there was only one set of myths to work out.

Summer into Fall

The next phase moves away from Vishnu to other items in the Museums collection. Hiroshige lead to a complete investigation of scenes of Japan but not a lot of good placements; Kobayashi Bridge the exception. Now further into the collection leads to Hudson River School painters. Aren't Frederick Church and George Bellows really exceptional? Good stuff!

11.11.11

Now it's fall. I've been enjoying some easy time with the american artists - Charles DeMuth, Wm Merrit Chase, and John LaFarge... I did have a funny (strange) wiki glitch thing happen: I was making some placements to various pages when I thought I'd look to see what I'd done on the User:Contributions page. But the last changes I'd made didn't appear...? I remember having signed in but then signed in again and made a change to the page of John LaFarge when I noticed that that change did appear on the contributions page. Knowing that I'd made an edit on the page about George Luks, I checked that and saw that the changes were listed as having been done by user:204.118.34.130 . This 'user' doesn't seem to have a talk page or bio... I'm thinking that it's more of a WikiGlitch than anything. The list of contributions goes back to 2005. Is this a person here.(?) puzzling? No?

And here's another odd thing about this. It wasn't the first time that this happened, one of the TissotBold text's I'd edited in May (Adoration of the Shepards) was also listed under this strange username.

I received this notice:

Proposed deletion of Anna S. Fisher

The article Anna S. Fisher has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. trunks_ishida (talk) 00:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the reply that this editor sent to the person who wanted to delete it: Hi. I've declined your BLP PROD on Anna S. Fisher, because it only applies to living people and the subject of this article is dead. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

hmmm ... I responded as follows.

Okay, Trunks + Boing - Re:Anna S. Fisher Thank you for your attention. BLP PROD? I have listed references as requested. I am puzzled somewhat by this process. I am unsure why this article wouldn't be listed as a stub and then whoever was interested in moving forward could amend the article? It seemed like the WikiPolice are fast on deletion rather than inclusive progress? Are the references ok as re-edited? WilliamJustinM —Preceding undated comment added 16:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC).

I don't want to be offended but what a crazy 'system'.

 "Declined the proposal to delete" ...   whoa

In order to find a good place for a nice image, I wrote an article(bio) of Anna S. Fisher. Just like in High School, it's the footnotes and citations that stymie me. No wonder I went to artschool. I'm not at all aware of what a BLP PROD is ... prod? production? proposed deletion? BLP biography of living person? well, she isn't alive. Hmmm

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:WilliamJustinM/Maria Oakey Dewing has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maria Oakey Dewing, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 18:28, 19 January 2012 (UTC) So, I added information about which institutions include Ms Dewing in their collections: The Smithsonian Institute, The National Gallery, Hood Museum, Detroit Insitute of the Arts... That should answer the collection of Notability ...[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Maria Oakey Dewing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

France3470 (talk) 05:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]