User talk:Wisdombuddha

final unblock attempt before bringing to arbitration committee

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wisdombuddha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Administrators, I have been had all of my accounts blocked indefinitely for over a month now even though Wikipedia sockpuppetry policy says: "Accusations of sockpuppetry result in many blocks and almost as many unblock requests, as Wikipedia policy calls for the sockpuppet account to be blocked indefinitely and the sockpuppeteer to be blocked for some length of time." I have explained that the sock puppeteer who used the accounts Geoffduggan, Helen37, Helen38, Trudy21, Wikilama, and Wisdomsword was not me, but an acquaintance who lived over one hour away from me. The check user shows we are in the same geographic area, but edited on different ISPs. If you check you can see there are several times when we were editing on different ISPs at the same time, over an hour away from each other. You can see the edits on May, 21st 2008 on the Dorje Shugden article to prove this. You can also see I got the article protected on this day from vandalism and that I work with many of the other editors to try and clean up this and other articles. I will bring this issue to the arbitration committee if it is not resolved here. Thank you Wisdombuddha (talk) 15:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This checkuser case right here states that you and Wikilama are the same person, and that the others are likely you. At present, no administrators (including myself, and I'm pretty much independent of the situation) are willing to unblock you, from the indications below. If you feel the need to take the situation to the Arbitration Committee, then you are free to do so. — Tony Fox (arf!) 15:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2nd unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wisdombuddha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have not used the Wikilama account for months. I stopped after I learned about sockpuppeting. [1]This page says that is is likely I am the other users, but a check user was never run that says I am. If you run a check user on me and all of these (Geoffduggan, Helen37, Helen38, Trudy21, Wikilama, Wisdomsword) you will see that I am not any of them. Please run the check user for fairness. Thank you Wisdombuddha (talk) 14:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, a checkuser was run at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wisdombuddha, and the findings confirmed that the accounts were sockpuppets. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 15:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1st unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wisdombuddha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The reason I was given for being blocked is abusing multiple accounts: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wisdombuddha; using socks to push POV.

I have only used 1 user account to edit the articles I work on. Where is the check user on me that shows I use any other account??

Decline reason:

This checkuser case proves that you used sock puppets abusively, which is prohibited. I see no reasons to believe that there is any kind of mistake. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 20:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Relevant threads/pages include Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wisdombuddha, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive140#POV edits from a group of users on Dorje Shugden, and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive413#Dorje Shugden and other Buddhism articles. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

None of these pages listed show that I am using a sock puppet! I was in these lists because I had editing during the editing storms by the user who was sock puppeting (Helen38, Geoffduggan, Wisdomsword and Helen37). This is a mistake. No check user proves this! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Wisdombuddha

No, it says "Confirmed that Wisdombuddha and Wikilama (talk · contribs) are the same person", which means that you violated WP:SOCK. Who of you is whose sockpuppet is completely irrelevant. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 18:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC)