I'm tired of discussing with the wikipedia inquisition and decided to abandon my old account and reincarnate.

After having received a topic-ban after, I must admit, some less diplomatic actions of mine for reason of citing several unwelcome parts of the 9/11 Commission's webpages into the appropriate wikipedia articles, while respecting all the Wikipedia guidelines of NPOV, RS etc. -- which turned out to be deemed a crime by the pro-Illuminati admin elite, I was now banned fully because of suspected socking by some account called Kaaskop666 which is not mine. I give up the arguing, but will --under protest-- keep respecting my topic ban, which says more about the failure of wikipedia to be open and fair[1], then it does about me.

Readers and editors beware. Cognitive dissonance creates warped minds, and makes wikipedia a dangerous place to get information and a time-consuming place to contribute information.

Xiutwel-0002 (talk) 11:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

inbox

You're being discussed at WP:ANI#Return of banned editor

Xiutwel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Xiutwel-0002 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Hello Xiutwel-0002. You seem to be a reincarnation of Xiutwel, who is indefinitely blocked. You should not be editing here using a new account. If you wish, you can respond to the above thread at WP:ANI. EdJohnston (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion. Since your original account is still blocked, you are still blocked. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 17:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I only adhere to rule nr. 1: ignore all rules, and let wikipedia be a great place of knowledge. Xiutwel-0002 (talk) 17:55, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]