User talk:Yoadi

Welcome

Hey! I, welcome you here on my talk page. You can leave your message below and I'll try to response as soon as possible.
Thank you!
Yoadi (talk)

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Iraag (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yoadi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Above mentioned block is not making sense to me even I am far far away from the above mentioned user. Yoadi (talk) 13:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

CU Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 14:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh no you aren't. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence who checks the relevant editing history will see that. Edits such as this one are pretty clear. I will also mention that even in the few edits you have made using this account, you have provided several further proofs that your original block was justified. For example, this edit and this one make it is clear that you are unaware that the fact that the title of a book mentions the words "gypsy magic" does not necessarily mean that the book is about the film "Gypsy Magic", and it evidently did not occur to you that you needed to check whether the books were about that film or not, confirming the competence issues that were raised at the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion about your editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]