User talk:Youbat

July 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing as a new editor brought to the site for the purpose of supporting ScholarM; see WP:MEAT. Compare Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ScholarM.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 13:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Youbat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, I am not brought by anyone to support ScholarM, but some of my edits were against ScholarM where I had reverted them for violating policies, It is ridiculous to accuse someone for meat puppetry, I did those edits because I was seeing "Pov Pushing" and "sectarian biases" by Mezzo on that article. Neither I have been paid by ScholarM and nor I was brought by them, hope a Just admin will look at my case as from beginning onwards I had been constructive to Wikipedia and want to help it further constructively. The edit warring was just due to content dispute which I will not do in future, instead I will try to discuss before making any edits on talk page. Also I want to discuss edit on Draft:Gyarvih Sharif, they must to look into edits carefully, where I had opposed ScholarM because they were against Wikipedia policy as they had copied content from " article copied from banned editor's created article", Also check user evidences confirm that we are not the same person, Just coincidently editing the same article in same area of interest and defending the attacks on someone shall make someone a Sock Puppet? If this was the policy, then I want to confirm that, Unfortunately I was unaware of it, I must deserve a second chance per WP:Bite . Furthermore, In that afd case for Sunnipath, I was not alone to put "Keep" remark there, instead other experienced editor of Wikipedia also put Keep there. And will try to not do personal attacks, and will try to copyedit the articles needing copyediting, along with destubbing and providing other relevant constructive development to various articles. (talk) 15:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

After reviewing the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ScholarM/Archive. It seems clear that you are here as a result of off wiki coordination with a blocked editor. I have no objection if another administrator wants to handle this differently. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 13:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

I think user should agree to topic ban on anything edited by ScholarM, agree to not edit war, describe what to do instead of edit warring, and make no persoanl attacks. Not an exhaustive list, just spitballing. And describe constructive edits. Anything I miss? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:11, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And referring to WP:BITE in an unblock request might piss people off. It does me. It's insulting. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Youbat, please don't make changes in a post that somebody has already responded to, especially not in a way that makes the other person's comment look nonsensical. That is what you did in removing your reference to WP:BITE after Deepfried complained about it.[1] Please don't wrongfoot other users in that way. Instead, if there is something you regret saying, strike it out using <s>...</s>. Bishonen | tålk 17:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]