User talk:YugiMuto

Citation needed for this. There is ZERO evidence to support such a baseless assumption. Don't revert this, otherwise Wikipedia is a hypocrite for supporting unreliable (and thus uncredible) statements.

I've blocked you for three days because you've continued to edit war on Avengers: Age of Ultron, this time as an IP editor. If you continue making disruptive edits, your next block is likely to be much longer. You're being given a chance here to change the way you edit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YugiMuto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't even know Masterblock even EXISTED. I need evidence for you to block me, not senseless speculation. YugiMuto (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YugiMuto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You have no evidence I am a sockpuppet YugiMuto (talk) 16:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To the contrary, there was evidence of sockpuppetry. Additionally with your other edits on your talk page, I'm withdrawing talk page access. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

YugiMuto (talk) 15:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)NinjaRobotPirate shut up. It's not disruptive. Wikipedia has no evidence for their "fact", so I FIXED it for them. It's not my fault Wikipedia is a hypocrite for supporting uncredible information.[reply]

Just to clear up one thing, it looks like I made a typo when adding the block template. The "masterblock" thing is part of that typo. As I said after placing the template, you were blocked because of edit warring while logged out. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 18:20, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Acroterion (talk) 18:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]