User talk:Zanuda petro

Hello, I'm ASpacemanFalls. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Hello, I'm ASpacemanFalls. Your recent edit(s) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Conflict of interest

Based on your edit summary, I'm assuming you are the researcher being referred to in that section of Telegram (software) that you insist on disrupting. Please, read the Wikipedia rules on conflict of interest and cease disruptive edits. I do not wish to escalate the matter if you are willing to actually learn the rules of Wikipedia. ASpacemanFalls (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Telegram (software). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. ASpacemanFalls (talk) 09:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ASpacemanFalls (talk) 09:35, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on repeated vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Telegram (software). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ASpacemanFalls (talk) 10:29, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on repeated vanadalism and ignorance of Wiki rules

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Telegram (software), you may be blocked from editing. ASpacemanFalls (talk) 11:34, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please acquaint yourself with WP:WARNVAND and note that I have no choice but to report you after the next warning.

Final vandalism warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Telegram (software). ASpacemanFalls (talk) 09:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deepfriedokra. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deepfriedokra, I can't remove the false data that Terlrgram supposedly publishes (in their favor and against the original source). The same user under the nickname https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ASpacemanFalls is waging an edit war and adding inaccurate information the way he wants (but which is the opposite in the original sources indicated).

Please check exactly these dozens of his edits of one topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegram_(software)#Security

In September 2021, a Russian researcher published details about a bug with the self-destruct feature that allowed the user to recover deleted photos from their own device. The bug was patched prior to publication and Telegram representatives offered a €1,000 bug bounty. The researcher did not sign the NDA that came with the offer and did not receive the award, opting to disclose the bug

I ask you to consider the edits of this user and take action (please read the source). Zanuda petro (talk) 09:28, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again. Discuss sourcing and content on the article talk page. I note that you want to replace that content with content sourced to Snoop. Again, you appear to have a conflict of interest because you wrote, "Тестовая страница для проверки Snoop," on your talk page. Again. I do not involve myself in content disputes. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Zanuda petro. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Telegram (software)) for a period of 31 hours for Disruption, readding WP:COI link. Refusing to discuss. Refusal to seek dispute resolution.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss content and sourcing on Talk:Telegram (software). Please address your apparent conflict of interest in linking to snoop. Please follow all of the dispute resolution processes I have already recommended. Please stop casting aspersions. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]