User talk:Zev Brook

16:04, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Zev Brook, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as River Malvam, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! wiooiw ^(talk) 23:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

River Malvam

I removed the speedy template for a hoax (Blame yahoo and bing). Please be aware that it can still be tagged for CSD. wiooiw ^(talk) 23:49, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fort Sparatinum

The article Fort Sparatinum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is by all accounts a not particularly notable imaginary place. This might belong as an one-liner trivia in articles on any real location this may be identified with, but scarcely merits a dedicated article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 11:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of River Akalon

The article River Akalon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is by all accounts a not particularly notable imaginary place. This might belong as an one-liner trivia in articles on any real location this may be identified with, but scarcely merits a dedicated article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 11:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leogetia

The article Leogetia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is by all accounts a not particularly notable imaginary place. This might belong as an one-liner trivia in articles on any real location this may be identified with, but scarcely merits a dedicated article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 11:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]