User talk:Zqq1996
| This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Northeastern_University/ENGW_3315_Advanced_Writing_in_the_Disciplines,_Online_(Fall_2017). Student assignments should always be carried out using a course page set up by the instructor. It is usually best to develop assignments in your sandbox. After evaluation, the additions may go on to become a Wikipedia article or be published in an existing article. |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Zqq1996, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Please don't move from mainspace pages to user namespace of nonexistent users. That is pages thaat starts with User:. Your page has already been moved into article space Rong Zhai so no need of any further move, just continue improving it. –Ammarpad (talk) 12:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi! I wanted to second this - also, the article could definitely use more sourcing. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Article evaluation
[edit]Otaku: when reading this article, I knew that I can make a considerable contribution to this topic. Because my understanding of Otaku is very comprehensive since I was a semi-Otaku when I was in middle school. This article certainly discussed a lot about Otaku: its origin, its impact, and its potential influence in the future. The article is also organized and easy to read. Every piece of information is based on facts and traceable. It is also written in a neutral tone by just stating the facts. I think it is a very good article even before I add my stuff to it.
-- plan to contribute I think the first thing I can add to the topic is the development of Otaku. Besides its origin, I can talk more about How it is getting popular and accepted by the general public. Moreover, I think how public seeing the Otaku can also be part of my contribution.
I just removed the added content [1] as it was tagged as original research. [2] Feel free to discuss possible inclusion here: Talk:Otaku#Proposed sections under "Discussion". Thanks! - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2018 (UTC)