User talk:Zzeon

Hello, Zzeon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Instead of creating more than one title for the same subject, check out Wikipedia:Redirect for how to automatically take the reader to the preferred title. I went ahead and did this for you for Mark edward baker.

Again, welcome! NickelShoe (Talk) 05:02, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== Image:Time-paradoxband.jpg listed for deletion ==

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Time-paradoxband.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —P ilotguy (ptt) 03:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I appreciate the help and info on Wiki! I did not understand the structure when creating the original article and thus there were two entries. The image deletion I can understand because I cannot prove public domain. Thanks. Zzeon 05:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Zzeon[reply]

Your contributions

I'm nominating Image:NoImageAvailable.jpg for deletion, because we already have Image:Nocover.png. This way, we keep everything standard around here.

As for Mark Edward Baker, I've had a look at what you wrote here and so I thought I should sort a few things out.

Whatever Baker has done, people here are going to want verifiable sources for all these things that he has done. That means coverage from some source independent of Baker himself, at the very least — and I can't even find on Google a musician named "Mark Edward Maker" at any site other than Wikipedia or its mirrors. This underground coverage you're talking about: if you've got an article about Baker printed in any kind of publication, I strongly suggest you cite it as a source or someone much more cynical than me is going to find the article eventually and nominate it for deletion when they see that the name gets no Google hits, or that most of the people Baker has worked with have red links. (There are lots of bands called "Paradox", but I can't seem to find this particular one.)

And one last thought: if nobody can find any other information about Baker or about most of these other people he's worked with, or projects he's worked on, outside of this one article — then what good does the article serve? How are readers going to make use of this information, unless you establish its background — the Phoenix underground music scene — as a verifiable phenomenon? (See Wikipedia:Notability (music) guidelines, as well.) –Unint 21:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will see what I can find to augment the article. You make a good point that it does no good to document the underground. Zzeon 22:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Zzeon[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eddie Baker

The article Eddie Baker has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Korny O'Near (talk) 17:09, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]