Jump to content

Verticordia sect. Intricata

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gderrin (talk | contribs) at 12:23, 23 September 2016 (Created page with '{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Verticordia'' sect. ''Intricata''}} {{taxobox |name = ''Verticordia'' sect. ''Intricata'' |regnum = Plantae |unranked_divisio = Angiosperm...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Verticordia sect. Intricata
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
(unranked):
(unranked):
(unranked):
Order:
Family:
Genus:
Subgenus:
Section:
Verticordia A.S.George sect. Intricata
Species

3 species: see text.

Verticordia sect. Intricata is one of eleven sections in the subgenus Verticordia. It includes three species of plants in the genus Verticordia. Plants in this section are usually bushy shrubs, sometimes cauliflower-like, with greyish leaves and fluffy or woolly pink to red, sometimes white flowers. The sepals have intricately branched lobes and hairy appendages and the stamens and staminodes are joined in a ring structure.[1] When Alex George reviewed the genus in 1991 he formally described this section, publishing the description in the journal Nuytsia.[2][3] The name Intricata is from the Latin word intricatus meaning "entangled" or "complicated"[4] referring to the intricately divided sepals.[1]

The type species for this section is Verticordia monadelpha and the other two species are V. mitchelliana and V. pulchella.[1]

References

  1. ^ a b c (Berndt) George, Elizabeth A.; Pieroni, Margaret (2002). Verticordia : the turner of hearts. Crawley, Western Australia ;Canberra: University Of Western Australia Press. p. 110. ISBN 1876268468.
  2. ^ "Verticordia sect. Intricata". APNI. Retrieved 23 September 2016.
  3. ^ George, Alex (1991). "New taxa, combinations and typifications in Verticordia (Myrtaceae: Chamelaucieae)". Nuytsia. 7 (3): 278.
  4. ^ Brown, Roland Wilbur (1956). The Composition of Scientific Words. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. p. 224.