Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/The Thadman
![]() | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
Wikipedian filing request:
- The Thadman (talk · contribs)
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
Wikipedia pages this pertains to:
- Fluffernutter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User talk:Aeon1006 (edit | [[Talk:User talk:Aeon1006|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Questions:
[edit]Have you read the AMA FAQ?
- Answer: Yep, I helped write them.
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
- Answer: Just a test of the new system. :-)
What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
- Answer: None, this is a test.
What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
- Answer: Nothing at all :-)
Summary:
[edit]~pokes microphone~ Testing, testing, one two three.
Discussion:
[edit]Followup:
[edit]When the case is closed, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
- Answer:
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how polite was your Advocate?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
- Answer:
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
- Answer:
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
- Answer:
AMA Information
[edit]Case Status: closed
Advocate Assigned:
- אמר Steve Caruso (desk/AMA) 00:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC) (Ironic? Yes. :-) )