Jump to content

Wikipedia:Article assessment/1980s comedy films/A Room with a View (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Assessment Article assessment
1980s comedy films
Assessment completed
6 March 2006
12 March 2006
Assessments
A Fish Called Wanda

The Adventures of Baron Munchausen
Back to the Future Good article
Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure
Brazil (film)
Coming to America
Crocodile Dundee
Ferris Bueller's Day Off
Ghostbusters
Heathers
Honey, I Shrunk the Kids Poor article
Little Shop of Horrors (1986 film)
Monty Python's Life of Brian
The Naked Gun
The Princess Bride (film)
A Room with a View (film) Poor article
Spaceballs
This Is Spinal Tap Good article
Three Men and a Baby
Time Bandits
Twins (film)
UHF (film)

Assessment of an article under the topic 1980s comedy films.


Article: A Room with a View (film)

Details of the assessment method can be found at the main page. Feel free to add comments when you assess an article, or use the talk page for discussion.

Review by Danaman5

[edit]
  • Coverage and factuality: 3
Almost nothing about the movie. Good info on awards, but poor synopsis. No citations.
  • Writing style: 5
Even what is there is not that good, with a run on sentence in the synopsis.
  • Structure: 5
Lead is ok, but needs more sections.
  • Aesthetics: 4
Standard infobox photo and nothing else.
  • Overall: 4

Almost a stub. Needs serious expansion. --Danaman5 06:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Review by violet/riga

[edit]
  • Coverage and factuality: 3
Very little coverage and no referencing.
  • Writing style: 4
Poorly written, with the lead being difficult to read and informal writing in the synopsis. The awards section could also be clearer.
  • Structure: 6
Good for what is there.
  • Aesthetics: 3
The lead is over-populated with links and brackets and the awards section is not particularly appealing.
  • Overall: 3

Should really have be exempt from assessment as it is basically a stub. Hopefully expansion will rectify the problems. violet/riga (t) 20:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Review by [name]

[edit]
  • Coverage and factuality:
  • Writing style:
  • Structure:
  • Aesthetics:
  • Overall: