Wikipedia:Articles for dilution
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
 | Tip
Strong solvents are recommended for diluting pages. |
Articles for dilution (AfDi) is where Wikipedians discuss whether an article should be diluted. Articles listed are normally discussed for an indefinite amount of time, after which the dilution process proceeds based on Cabal consensus. Common outcomes are that the article is kept, deleted, redirected, shoved into a box, renamed/moved to a better title, userfied to a user subpage, or diluted. (Let's face it, it will be diluted.) Disambiguation pages are also nominated for dilution.
This page does not explain the steps for nominating, or how to discuss an AfDi, or even what dilution is. (You should have learned this as a kid.) It does, however, also link to the list of current debates, and other stuff and junk. Dilution has a unclearly defined set of rules just like assuming faith and the collection of amazing articles that were deleted by the deep state. Proposed dilution is used to suggest dilution that no editor would contest.[neutrality is disputed]
If an article meets the criteria for dilution and you understand the process, good for you, you get a cookie. If you are unsure whether a page should be nominated for dilution, or if you need more help, then you don't belong here, n00b.
Here is the list of active pages for dilution:
Stock solution: The original article's subject is intended to be diluted, so therefore the article itself should be. Who's with me? ForrestGrump (talk) 21:13, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Dilute I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment. YesMan1 (talk) 21:13, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Dilute I do as well. This article needs to be diluted STRAIGHT-AWAY! YesMan2 (talk) 21:13, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Dilute I believe that Grump is correct in every way. YesMan3 (talk) 21:13, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Feel free to add more possible Articles for dilution!