Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DinoBot
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Owner | User:T-rex |
---|---|
Function | Replacing html with wiki-syntac |
Language | English |
Program | pywikipedia framework |
Mode | Starts manually, edits are all manually approved (details) |
Frequency | Whenever, single runs will only be about 20 min max, most often shorter |
- I do realize that this bot doesn't do much yet, but I plan on expanding it's capablities later, and I figured I may as well get this much approved, and just ask permission for future functions in the future --T-rex 02:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems simple enough, though I can't think of many pages with raw html, save spam pages. Nevertheless, if there is anything to fix then be my guest. What is the edit seperation delay? If the edits are manually approved then I don't see any issues here.Voice-of-All 15:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- On the assumtion that every single page needs to be fixed edits are about once every 30 seconds, in reality the rate is about 4 to 5 times slower then that --T-rex 18:42, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Testing approved, up to 100 pages, up to two weeks, post results here when done. — xaosflux Talk 03:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the approval, I'll start the tests tomorrow... --T-rex 03:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Test Results
[edit]well you can see all the difs in the contributions log and I would consider the tests to be a success. I did find one small error, as the program rendered <h1> to be = instead of ==, but this has been fixed --T-rex 01:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- also the speed turned out to be a bit quicker then I anticipated at times, but never quicker then two edits a minute, typically closer to one edit every two minuetes --T-rex 01:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Approved. I've looked over about 10% of the contributions, no one else has posted any problems, and you have fixed the only problem you found. You've proven responsibility enough for me to grant approval. -- RM 01:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.