Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MizBot
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Request Expired.
Operator: Miszatomic (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 17:35, Thursday December 19 2013 (UTC)
Automatic or Manual: Manuel
Programming language(s): Python (pywikipdia bot)
Source code available: No
Function overview: No
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Reverts Vandelsim
Edit period(s): Continueous
Estimated number of pages affected: it depend on the articles that they vandalize
Exclusion compliant (Y/N):
Already has a bot flag No):
Function details: This bot is made to revert vandelsim, test edits, blanking pages and content replacement, it leaves a message ln the user or ip talk page
Discussion
[edit]Why can you not just manually revert vandalism with your main account? Anomie⚔ 20:33, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
These are my thoughts exactly. A manual vandalism and all the other mentioned problem edits is pretty much just human editing. Unless this bot is offering advanced assistance, like ClueBot or Huggle, I doubt this even counts as a bot or script. I also have concerns about operator's competence as seen by poor filling in this form and almost non-existent function details. This hasn't even been transcluded on the main page. We would need way more detail before any further action is taken. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 20:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Request Expired. Never transcluded. - Jarry1250 [Vacation needed] 21:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.
