Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/botlannon

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Denied.

botlannon

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: Blannon (talk · contribs)

Automatic or Manually assisted: Manually assisted, but no editing

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Pywikipediabot

Function overview: Lookup various medical terms and return wikipedia intro paragraph.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): no editing, read only.

Estimated number of pages affected: 0

Exclusion compliant (Y):

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):

Function details:

Discussion

If the bot will not be editing, then I see no need to give it approval (or even create an account, for that matter, but I suppose pywikipedia requires one). If you need the +bot permission for some reason, such as to make API requests with higher limits, then yes – bot approval is necessary – but otherwise, I think you can just go ahead and run it without approval. So, do you need to make high-limit API requests? — The Earwig ^(talk) 15:40, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Request Expired. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 11:48, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.