Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/1997 Pacific hurricane season/addition3

1997 Pacific hurricane season (3rd supplementary nomination)[edit]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/1997 Pacific hurricane season for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

Tropical Storm Ignacio (1997)

1997 Pacific hurricane season

11 articles

Timeline

Tropical Storm Andres

Hurricane Guillermo

Tropical Storm Ignacio

Well, here is another one, I'm adding an article to a topic this time. 1997 PHS was a record-breaking season, but sadly, I don't think any new articles can be made. Hope you like it. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 17:04, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yea, that should've been added a while ago. Support the addition of Ignacio. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, several issues are found in the book report. It's been a while since that topic has been maintained... Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 02:42, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ Timeline is over three years old. It fails WP:ACCESS, WP:DASH... but it could easily be fixed. Happy to support when resolved. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Featured lists don't expire after 3 years, and determining if a list still meets the featured list criteria isn't our job here. Rreagan007 (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that is not really relevant to the addition to Ignacio. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 23:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well if one of the main articles (in this case, the list) is delisted because it's nominated at WP:FLRC, then this whole process is a waste of time. So if the main article isn't fixed, then I'll nominate it for delisting. Why not just fix the issues I've noted rather than promote a topic one of whose main article clearly isn't up to scratch any more. When I noted it was over three years old, the point was to draw your attention to the fact that it no longer meets our current standards at WP:FLC so it should be fixed. This is a curious process if no-one actually looks at the content of the topic, just the titles... The Rambling Man (talk) 07:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like User:TropicalAnalystwx13 has done a good job of fixing most of the issues here, so well done. Nice to see editors who wish to maintain the standards and not just collect arbitrary stars on sub-standard topics. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Rreagan007 (talk) 23:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Closed with consensus to add article to GT. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 19:47, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]