Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Final Fantasy VIII/addition1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Final Fantasy VIII (1st supplementary nomination)

[edit]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Final Fantasy VIII for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

Articles already included:

Main page Articles
Final Fantasy VIII Characters of Final Fantasy VIII - Squall Leonhart - Rinoa Heartilly - Music of Final Fantasy VIII

Self-nom. Hi everybody. Like I said in the original nomination, the only two holes are not major ones (Chocobo World and a setting article, which at the time did not exist anyway). Both of these articles have attained GA (although the former could probably use a bit more work). — Deckiller 18:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I thought, and I'm quoting you in the previous nomination, that "Chocobo World, though in the template, is not significant enough to the topic to be in it- it's a separate game, unrelated to FF8, the only connection it had was that you could take items you found in that game and transfer them into FF8, if you happened to have the rare gameplayer that ran it. It would need to be in a Chocobo topic, but not an FF8 one." ? Kariteh 14:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That was rationale WRT the main nomination; that it wasn't large enough gap to oppose over. But now that there's additions being made, there's no reason not to include it. — Deckiller 15:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
True, I said that. I don't feel like it's a big enough relation to FF8 to be necessary. At the same time, I don't feel like it's so unrelated as to not be included in the topic if others want it to. I'm just not that bothered about it. In regards to Triple Triad, there was once an article by that name, which I merged into Minigames of Final Fantasy months and months ago. I don't think that it should be in the FF8 template in the first place, though removing it while the FT nom is up would be bad form, but I don't think that there's any reason to add a section of an article to the topic. --PresN 05:29, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]