Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Marcus Aurelius/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 12:43, 28 September 2018 [1].

Marcus Aurelius

Nominator(s): Векочел (talk) 19:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about Marcus Aurelius, Roman emperor from 161 to 180. He was the fifth emperor of the Nerva-Antonine dynasty, as well as the last during the era of the Five Good Emperors and the Pax Romana. He was also a Stoic philosopher known for his writings Meditations. Among the events of his reign were the Roman–Parthian War of 161–166, the Marcomannic Wars and the Antonine Plague. Векочел (talk) 19:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note Ian Rose, Laser brain and Sarastro1. There seems to be something wrong here. I can not see this nomination in the candidates list. Is it the bot's fault?.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 22:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I forgot that the bot doesnt do this. Its the editor who should do it. What should happen with this now? put it at the top of the list or between the nominations of early August?.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 22:15, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see many paragraphs ending without citations (which is a minimum requirement, really), and without looking further, I'd suggest the article be taken through peer review or good article nomination before FAC. FunkMonk (talk) 07:49, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@FunkMonk: I've added a citation for the adoption of Marcus Aurelius by Antoninus Pius. Which other unsourced paragraphs have you noticed? Векочел (talk) 12:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the easiest way to find out is to look through the article, everywhere a paragraph ends (it is not up to reviewers to point this out, it should be fixed before nomination). FunkMonk (talk) 12:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have added more citations where possible. I have had to remove a few things stated in the article. Векочел (talk) 23:12, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a massive amount of work done recently on my favourite philosopher, and a credit to you. However, this article is attempting to jump from Quality=C to Quality=FA, and I agree with Funkmonk. It would benefit from a WP:GAC review first, which is still a major achievement in itself. The article attracts 4,000 visitors each day - or over 1 million each year - and warrants a bit more time being developed through the quality process. Here may be the best place to start: Wikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome/Guides William Harris • (talk) • 10:55, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coord note -- I agree that a great deal of work has gone into this but also with the implications I'm hearing from above, i.e. that this nom is probably premature and that the article would really benefit from review elsewhere before FAC, namely GAN and Peer Review (or indeed MilHist A-Class Review). I'm therefore going to archive this and recommend those avenues (and the guide William mentions) be pursued before a future FAC nomination. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:59, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ian Rose: I plan to change the structure of the sources. Then I will probably nominate the article for GAC. Векочел (talk) 11:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tks, hope things go well. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:43, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Ian Rose (talk) 12:43, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.