Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Billboard Top Latin Songs Year-End Chart/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 06:59, 21 September 2010 [1].

Billboard Top Latin Songs Year-End Chart[edit]

Billboard Top Latin Songs Year-End Chart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Jaespinoza (talk) 06:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I think it is acurate and complete, it includes the best performing Latin singles since the Billboard Top Latin Songs chart inception. I'll be glad to receive feedback about it so it can be useful. Thanks. Jaespinoza (talk) 06:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 06:41, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Any good reason that image isn't on the right-hand side of the page?
FIXED
  • "in the last issue of" clarify this is the last issue for that particular year.
FIXED
  • "and it yielded " no need for "it".
FIXED
  • You need to say that yellow background and bold text is used to denote the most successful single of the year.
FIXED
  • Check where "Cómo..." sorts with regard to the other C... words.
I have been trying my best to sort it right, but maybe I am not doing it right, can somebody help me?
I think you probably need to force the sort using the {{sort}} template. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed this for you. You have to {{sort|"Como...|"Title"}}. Missing the quotation mark in the first parameter breaks the sorting worse than it was broken before. Courcelles 08:12, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • And "Déjame..." with D's.
  • And "Lástima..." with L's. In general, if the second letter of a song title has a diacritic, it sorts out of logical order.
Did these two too, since I was already mucking around with your table. Courcelles 08:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some Billboard refs seem to have a publisher, some don't.
The refs for the magazine have publisher, but the ref from the webpage says only Billboard, do i have to duplicate it in the refs?
I see, perhaps you need to make it clear that the magazine is being referenced (ie. Billboard magazine) rather than just the official website. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't use all capitals in reference titles.
FIXED.

The Rambling Man (talk) 12:17, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Jaespinoza (talk) 19:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Refs 1, 4, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 26 need publisher. TbhotchTalk C. 16:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FIXED. Jaespinoza (talk) 03:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Comment Good list as usual. My only concern is that bold is discouraged as an indicator; consider using symbols (such as * or #) instead. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Since I am already using color to show the best-performing single of the year, I can take the bold out, without other indicator, what do you think? Jaespinoza (talk) 18:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I've looked at this a few times, and nothing is jumping at me. I do wonder if some of the unlinked songs are actually sufficiently notable, but I'm not certain of notability requirements in the field. Courcelles 04:20, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Billboard_Top_Latin_Songs_Year-End_Chart/archive1&oldid=1138479171"