Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Bong Joon-ho filmography/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 24 October 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Bong Joon-ho filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the FL-criteria. The article has been edited to contain the same qualities as other Fls, including the recently promoted M. Night Shyamalan filmography, which I co-nominated. Pinging @BRVAFL as a major contributor. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from TRM
[edit]Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*What are "narrative films"?
That's my first pass. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 14:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
Image review – Pass
[edit]- The only image (File:Okja Japan Premiere- Bong Joon-ho (37867629864).jpg) is from Flickr, and is properly licenced. Pass for image review. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "Motel Cactus, where he also served as an assistant director" => "Motel Cactus, for which he also served as an assistant director"
- "encouraged to write a play, which resulted in the creation and release of Parasite in 2019" => "encouraged to write a play, which resulted in the creation and release of the film Parasite in 2019" (to make it 100% clear that Parasite is not in fact a play)
- Absolutely no idea if the Korean title column sorts correctly, so I will AGF that it does.....
- Music video table should probably have the Korean title in its column to match the films table
- Performance credits table could be sortable
- That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:56, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Your comments have been addressed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:23, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)
- The headers of tables need to have colscopes, e.g. `! rowspan=2 | Year` should be `! scope=col rowspan=2 | Year`. This along with rowscopes helps screen reader software accurately read out the cells of the table. You have it on a couple of them, but it needs to be on all, including the English/Original headers. --PresN 14:06, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Source review – Pass
[edit]Version reviewed — 1
- Formatting
- Ref#16 – the name "A.O. Scott" needs to be formatted as last name and first name.
- Ref#29 – "New Brunswick, New Jersey" is the only location added for any reference, so you might wan to remove it for consistency. And format the ISBN number "9781978818903" using this tool.
- Ref#33 and Ref#34 – add archive links and archive date just for consistency, since all other citations have.
- Reliability
- Seems fine.
- Verifiability
- Did a few spot-checks (Ref#13, 17, 26). Everything looks good. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kavyansh.Singh All
Done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Some Dude From North Carolina – Thanks! Everything looks good. Pass for source review. Would appreciate your comments at this FLC. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:24, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kavyansh.Singh All
- I support this nomination for promotion but have one comment:
who began his career in the late 1990s, creating the 1994 [...]
— is 1994 considered late in the 90s, especially considering it's part of the first half...? Pamzeis (talk) 12:58, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- October comments – @Giants2008, PresN, and The Rambling Man: Can this nomination be passed now? There are five supporting votes for this list to be an FL. I have the same question about the Nicolas Cage filmography nomination, which has four 'support' votes. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The nomination will be passed when a coordinator is able to take a look at it an evaluate it; for the record, it does not have 5 supporting votes, it has 2- ChrisTheDude and Pamzeis. The others were an image review, a source review, and comments without a concluding comment. --PresN 17:27, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]- Overall a great list. I have one minor comment: shouldn't the rowheaders be plain? Ippantekina (talk) 12:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ippantekina:
Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:51, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Though the issue remains with the "Critical reception" section, that is not enough to keep me from supporting this list for FL. Please do resolve the issue later on. Ippantekina (talk) 04:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ippantekina:
Promoting. --PresN 18:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.