Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Bangladesh Twenty20 International wicket-keepers/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 22 April 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Bangladesh Twenty20 International wicket-keepers[edit]
List of Bangladesh Twenty20 International wicket-keepers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): A.A Prinon (talk) 04:35, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I had put effort to create this article. I tried to deliver a very good article with reliable sources and significant coverage. I tried to create in a way that meets WP:GNG. I gave lists of wicket-keepers serially with reliable sources.A.A Prinon (talk)
- Comment
- The text at the top of this page says "Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed". Your existing FLC does not yet have substantial support, so you need to wait a while before starting another one..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:44, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Per Chris's comment above, A.A Prinon, can you please withdraw your nomination for the time being? Use {{@FLC}} to ping the direct/delegates. Aza24 (talk) 19:47, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accessibility review: The table is missing colscopes, rowscopes, and a caption. For further details, see your other FLC, where I note you have not responded to the accessibility review.
As noted, that FLC does not have substantial support, so this should be closed. On top of that, this list is minuscule- its 6 items are exceeded only slightly by the 7 sentences of text scattered over 4 paragraphs. I'm going to go ahead and close this; once your other FLC is closed or has received substantial support you can re-nominated, though I ask that you take a step back and consider first, as a list typically needs a lot of justification and content to justify having <10 items. --PresN 03:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.