Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Governors of the Reserve Bank of Australia/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 23:03, 6 June 2009 [1].
List of Governors of the Reserve Bank of Australia[edit]
- Nominator(s): Hello32020 (talk) 19:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this to become a featured list, because I believe it meets the FL criteria. It is fairly short, but I believe it is comprehensive for the topic at hand. Now, one thing that may be asked is why some life spans are omitted: this is due to lack of information regarding their life spans (which I have attempted to look for). The article on the person may even have info on their life span, but these dates appear to be original research. Hello32020 (talk) 19:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn Hello32020 (talk) 22:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - this list appears to be a content fork of Reserve Bank of Australia and this can reasonably be able to merge with it. I will most likely oppose per Wikipedia:Featured list criteria 3b, but I will hold it until others have commented.—Chris! ct 19:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Response - This list is not a content fork, although a few sentences of it are a summary of the article you referred to. Other then that and the table being similar, the list incorporates the significance of the role of the Governor as the head of the Reserve Bank of Australia. This is significant enough to make it a separate list. Hello32020 (talk) 20:28, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per 3b. There's no second guessing on my part. The content of this page can be a very good section in the main article. There's absolutely no need to have a separate page.--Crzycheetah 20:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose—3b. The table already exists in the main article, and whatever relevant information that is in the lead here could added into the governors section of the main article, in probably two paragraphs. The lifetime of the governors) is irrelevant and should be omitted. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:26, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw - Due to the consensus being against my argument, I will withdraw this nomination and merge the new information and table, which I will remove the life spans from, into the article. When I complete that, I will redirect the list to the article in question. Hello32020 (talk) 22:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.