I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meet all of the featured list criteria. It is modeled after List of World Heritage Sites in Spain, a recently promoted FL. Grsz11 19:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 22:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Should the "Image" column be mentioned in the itemized list before the main table?
I was told in one of my former FLC, to wikilink publishers in references. Not sure if it is (still) a requirement.
For the record, wikilinks are not necessary for the publishers. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:32, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply. Everything fine as far as these two things are concerned. Unfortunately I don't have the time for a full review this time and therefore prefer to stay neutral. bamse (talk) 00:19, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
There is text overflowing from the location map image. You should either increase the map image or reduce the text size to avoid this;
I believe "ratified" is better applied to the official signing of conventions/declarations than just "accepted";
"... at the 7th Session...";
The second paragraph could be turned into a single sentence, for example: «At the 7th Session of the World Heritage Committee, held in Florence, Italy, in 1983, Peru had its first sites inscribed on the list: the "City of Cuzco" and the "Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu".»
The third paragraph is still related to the previous one, so you might as well join them into a more robust paragraph;
"Sites in Peru..." → "Peruvian sites..." (to avoid too many "Peru"s);
"In 1997 a wildfire..." — Add comma after the year;
Cuzco or Cusco?
No need to add "region" to every region in the table, the column header already says it;
In Machu Pichu's description: "The site of Machu Picchu sits at 2,340 metres (7,680 ft) above sea level was constructed..." → "At 2,340 metres (7,680 ft) above sea level, the site of Machu Pichu was constructed...";
In Huascaran park description: "... is located at the Cordillera Blanca...";
You have plenty of space to let those two images after the list display their default size (don't specify width).
Comment - Ref 12 is dead. Ref 27 lists a full date I was wondering why you've chosen to only include the year in the article. Afro (Talk) 20:56, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Ref 12: I provided a different link that leads to the same work. Grsz11 21:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Support - I see no problem with the list. Afro (Talk) 01:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Support - Not that this detracts from my support, but I find it odd that after mentioning extreme weather conditions in the lead, the somewhat more mundane weather risks to Chan Chan, the only endangered site on the list, are not also called out. (I know, it probably doesn't rain much at Chan Chan.) Magic♪piano 20:19, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
I coudn't find much particularly on Chan Chan. I think the issue is that just rain in general is damaging. Grsz11 14:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.