Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Parks and Recreation/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Parks and Recreation[edit]

List of awards and nominations received by Parks and Recreation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Mymis (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating it for featured list because I do believe that it passes the FL criteria. The article includes a list of various awards and nominations received by popular American television sitcom Parks and Recreation that aired on NBC. Mymis (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by jfhutson[edit]

  • Be consistent with whether you use the Oxford comma.
  • ”The Online Film & Television Association Award honors the achievements in film and television.” “The Peabody Award recognizes the excellence in various platforms of the media.” Lose the definite articles and maybe be more specific, especially on the first one.
  • The show is described by the award association as: “[...] Parks and Recreation has crafted…” doesn't make sense as a sentence.
  • Parks and Recreation has five nominations: three times…” are we talking nominations or times nominated? --JFH (talk) 14:32, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I fixed the issues. Do you have any further comments? Thanks! Mymis (talk)

Looks good, I support. I reviewed the images and they appear to be appropriately lisenced (btw I find the pic of Poehler at the Peabody Awards in shorts hilarious). The sources look fine on the face of it. Awards associations might be considered primary sources but these are not controversial claims. --JFH (talk) 18:55, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support – nothing problematic stands out, satisfies the criteria on style and comprehensiveness. Lemonade51 (talk) 22:43, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
*Usually in articles, people are mentioned with their full name once and the following entries are by their surname.
  • None of the recipient(s) or nominee(s) are wikilinking in the table. I think convention for these type of articles was that the first time they are included in a table they are linked.
  • For the ALMA Awards I think those should be n dash not m dash
  • For Cinema Audio Society, odd phrasing of "most outstanding", how about just outstanding?
  • For American Comedy Awards, use the past tense as the series has finished, same for Cinema Audio Society, Critics' Choice, Emmy Awards etc.
  • Typo in Online Film and Television Awards "Parks and Recreation reveived eighteen nominations"
  • In the notes, the award being shared should be phrased in the past tense.

Cowlibob (talk) 09:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for taking a look at my article, very much appreciated! I believe I fixed all the issues. However, I disagree with changing tenses, don't think there's anything wrong with saying "Parks and Recreation has two wins", the show still does have those wins and nominations for those specific years, even after the show ended. Mymis (talk) 16:20, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good list. Cowlibob (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support – The article is well-rounded and well-referenced. Carbrera (talk) 03:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support with a couple of issues
    • The sitcom was nominated for, and won, a variety of different awards, including fifteen Primetime Emmy Award nominations - "and won" should be removed or just be reworded differently
    • When you mentioned Paul Rudd in the lead, I think you should mention how he relates to the series

--Cheetah (talk) 22:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I dealt with the issues, thank you for your support! Mymis (talk) 08:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source Review
  • Formatting: Passed; do note that if you have an archive on a citation where the url is still live, if you put "|deadurl=no" it will change from "archive link. Archived from the original" to "original link. Archived from the original", so that the first link is to the (faster loading) live site.
  • Spotchecks: checked refs 8, 28, 43, 64, 65, 66; refs 64-66 do not mention parks and rec at all. They do not show anything about the nominations at all, actually, and 65 is about Scandal winning a different category all together.
  • Completeness: Pass.

The TV guide references need to be fixed before this can pass. --PresN 16:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking a look at my article. I dealt with the reference formatting. Not sure about the TV Guide awards, I think I transferred them from the main article when created the award article; the current refs only have winners listed, not the nominees, however, I cannot find appropriate refs now, only IMDb which probably are not very reliable tho. I probably have to remove the award from the article. Mymis (talk) 10:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if no sources note the nominees, then it's not that notable of an award. Source review passed, promoting. --PresN 01:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Parks_and_Recreation/archive1&oldid=1138485873"