Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by The Good Place/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by The Good Place

Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by The Good Place/archive1

Nominator(s): RunningTiger123 (talk) 05:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Good Place is an American sitcom starring Kristen Bell and Ted Danson that finished its four-season run last January. It was acclaimed during its run, leading to a range of awards and nominations at both comedy and fantasy award ceremonies (a combination that isn't seen much, especially on network TV). I have worked hard to keep the formatting and sourcing strong since creating the list, and now that the show has finished airing and the awards for its final season have come in (barring any end-of-year nominations over the next few weeks), I think it's time to nominate this list for FL status. As always, any and all comments are welcome. RunningTiger123 (talk) 05:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

I notice the mention on the talk page about a debate regarding linking an item every time it appears vs only the first time. My feeling is that it should be linked every time...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Chris - lists are not necessarily read from top to bottom the same way regular prose-based articles are, and with sortable tables there is no guarantee that the "first" mention will be the first encountered even if one reads the entire list.--Alexandra^IDV 08:37, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added the duplicate wikilinks back. For what it's worth, that's what I personally prefer as well – someone else removed them and I didn't want to get drawn into a long argument over it. RunningTiger123 (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I made a change to the alt text for the title card (feel free to tweak the specific wording), but otherwise this all looks good.--Alexandra^IDV 10:44, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Everything looks good to me. ~ HAL333 00:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - All sourced, all references are archived, and the article's lead is in excellent shape. Great work! Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:14, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 19:28, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"four seasons and fifty-three episodes " four seasons comprising a total of fifty-three episodes
"19, 2016 to" comma after 2016.
"he designed, as a reward for her righteous life" being pedantic, this reads like the place was designed for her, but that's not the case, right?
- Correct – I removed the phrase for clarity.
"has been nominated" why not "was" as the series is finished?
- This was left over from when the series was still airing. It has been fixed.
Why the thin spaces before footnotes? Is that MOS-compliant?
- I added the thin spaces because to me, the footnotes looked better when not directly against the text. However, MOS:CITEPUNCT does state that this is not acceptable, so I have removed the spaces.
Spaced hyphens in ref titles need to be en-dashes.
- I assume this is referring to the titles for Emmy nomination pages, in which case it has been fixed.
Likewise year range in ref 67.

That's about it. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 15:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: The changes have been made; I've added a few comments above as needed. RunningTiger123 (talk) 19:19, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support my comments addressed. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 19:28, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support with comments from Gerald Waldo Luis

Generally support this article as a fine list with good prose, meets the FLC IMO. Below are just some small concerns.

(Note A) It would be better to relocate the internal citations. For example, in the Season One bullet, "Season 1 holds a 92% approval rating based on 73 reviews on Rotten Tomatoes[4] and a score of 78 based on 32 reviews on Metacritic.[5]"
- Done.
The alt text has "green background" on it. Perhaps "lime background" to be more specific?
- Changed to "lime-green background"
Perhaps have a caption that reads, "Title screen of the series"?
- Caption now reads "Title card of the series"
(Nom 3) Link foley artist?
- Done. (Link also added in Nom 5)

Gerald WL 17:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerald Waldo Luis: I've made the changes you suggested and added some comments above. Let me know what you think. RunningTiger123 (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RunningTiger123, all good now. Feel free to collapse my comments if you want to. Gerald WL 18:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --Pres N 04:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.